Congratulations to Phil for nailing this one: "The point really is that it's not the wisdom of the crowds, it's a gentle dictatorship of the chaperones" - which is slightly more pointed than the Chris Wilson/Slate article he cited. He only noted "the wisdom of the chaperones". He, in turn was referencing a multi-authored paper (PDF), "Power of the Few vs. Wisdom of the Crowd: Wikipedia and the Rise of the Bourgeoisie" by Ed Chi and colleagues. To be fair, Wikipedia's founder, Jimmy Wales, is supposed to have said it first; he is quoted as saying, "most of the work on Wikipedia is done by a small number of users" in 2004 [URL no longer active].Does this affect our view of a major Web resource? Should it?Possibly. Those of us who have been advocating its use have mostly based our arguments...

Pan yn chwilio am gyfarwyddiadau, dwi unai'n defnyddio multimap neu Google maps, mae'r ddau yn wych. Sylwais heddiw bod multimap rwan yn danogs erthyglau Wikipedia. Dwi'n gweld hwn yn ddefnyddiol iawn pan yn paratoi i ymweld â rhywle newydd. Mae'r llun isod yn dangos canol Caerdydd sydd ag ambell i erthygl, ond sbiwch ar hwn o ganol...
Dwi wrth fy modd gyda Wicipedia a Wikipedia. Yn ddiweddar dwi di bod yn treulio mwy o amser ar y ddau yn hytrach nag ar flogio. Byddai grêt petai mwy yn cyfrannu at yr Cymraeg, ac dwi am bostio rhyw fath o 'quick guide' i'r peth yn fuan. Wrth sgwennu, mae 13,623 o erthyglau ar y fersiwn Gymraeg, gobeithio wir na gymerith lawer i gyrraedd y garreg filltir o 15,000 erthygl. Mae yna dipyn o wahaniaeth rhwng y Wiki Cymraeg a'r Saesneg a nid dim ond mewn niferoedd yr erthyglau a chyfranwyr. Dau beth mae'nt yn weddol llym arno ar y Wikipedia Saesneg yw:Notability: "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."Verifiability: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth....

The Wikipedia article for Rhondda’s Labour MP Leighton Andrews is being vandalised.
Interesting elements of Andrews’ career are being removed from the article only to be restored by conscientious editors.
It is like a virtual tug-o-war played out publically in a small niche of Welsh cyberspace.
So what is this Wikipedia thing ? Wikipedia is the world’s largest encyclopaedia and it’s all available for free online.
The encyclopaedia was created by a collaborative effort involving people from across the world.
If there isn’t an article on a noteworthy subject, then create it.
If you want to contribute or edit an article, you can.
Thus in the example of the Leighton Andrews article, certain facts have been removed.
References to political researcher David Taylor...
In
Politics,
welsh assembly,
Leighton Andrews,
Rhondda,
welsh_assembly,
welsh_assembly_government,
labour_party,
welsh_labour,
bbc_wales,
Censorship,
Wikipedia

Aberdare’s greatest living comedian and entertainer joins the pantheon of greats at Wikipedia.
Read the article today…...
Mae'n debyg bod gan y mwyafrif o gyfrannwr at Wikipedia a Wicipedia rhyw fath o agenda neu reswm dros ychwnaegu erthyglau, yna aml iawn eisiau rhannu gyda'r byd gwybodaeth am bynciau sydd o ddiddordeb iddyn nhw - yn sicr dyna pam ymunais i. A gyda unrhyw wefan o'r fath ble mae'r defnyddwyr yn darparu'r cynnwys, mae'n mynd i fod yn anodd bod yn ddi-safbwynt weithiau. Be sy'n dda am Wikipedia yw eich bod yn gallu gweld yr holl newidiadau a wneir i pob erthygl, a hyd yn oed cymharu newidiadau.Darllenais sylw ar flog Vaughan Roderick am anturiaethau un cyfranwr o'r enw normalmouth sydd wedi bodyn addasu erthygl Plaid Cymru, er mwyn sicrhau bod y geiriau 'fascist' ac 'anti-semitic' yn ymddangos yn yr erthygl.Mae hefyd wedi dileu unrhyw gyfeiriadau at 'sosialaeth' a 'pasiffistiaeth' o'r...

Not according to Wikipedia. It's hardly an authority, I know, but it does seem a bit odd that the page on unionism refers only to trade unionism, and then unionism in Ireland, Scotland, Romania and Moldova.So why the glaring omission? Welsh Tories clearly see themselves as unionists. David Davies AM even insisted on being called by his party's full name - the Conservative and Unionist Party - during one plenary session last term. Other notable self-confessed unionists are Peter Hain and Leighton Andrews. Perhaps they should all club together and rustle up a page for Wikipedia. Even the nationalists have one of...

The Freecycle Network is an American business that runs freecycling groups across Wales, including Cardiff Freecycle currently Wales’ largest freecycling group.
Rhondda Cynon Taff Ecycle is NOT a part of the (American) Freecycle Network (or TFN). We are an independent local group, owned, run, and managed by local people.
Perhaps it is time we wrote a brief ‘history’ for our group now that we are nearly two years old.
Many freecyclers are unaware of the controversies surrounding the American Freecycle Network. Below is a brief summary taken from Wikipedia. Feel free to add to the article at Wikipedia.
Freecycle Network Controversies
* Corporate Sponsorship - In February 2005, Deron Beal accepted TFN’s first corporate support of $130,000 from Waste Management,...
In
blog,
General News,
rhondda cynon taff,
freecycling,
freecycle,
Wales News,
Deron Beal,
Rhondda Cynon Taff Ecycle,
The Freecycle Network,
Waste Management International,
Wales,
Wikipedia

I did a google search for a list of countries at war. Instead it gave me a list of countries with McDonald's franchises. It looks like McDonald's has failed where the British empire succeeded: colonising Africa. So what do you do if you're in the Congo and gagging for a McFlurry?Do you dodge the McHutus and the McTutsis and treck thousands of miles to the nearest golden arches in Egypt?Or do you head south through the McGenocide and the desert towards South Africa and hope that you come across a trot-thru for you and your camel along the way?[The countries in grey have no...
Tra'n chwilio am fanylion cwrs dyma fi'n dod ar draws blog newydd o'r enw Datblogu gan Daniel Cunliffe, sy'n uwch ddarlithydd yn yr adran Gwyddorau Cyfrifiadurol ym Mhrifysgol Morgannwg. Mae'r wefan wedi ei gynnal ar Glamorgan BlogsDaniel Cunliffe muses about minority languages online, IT and language planning, the Welsh language and technology, design, blogging and wikis – among other things.Dwi'n edrych ymlaen i weld beth sydd ganddo i'w ddweud gan fod diddordeb mawr ganddo yn nefnydd yr iaith Gymraeg ar y wê er nad yw'n rhugl yn yr iaith ei hun.Mewn un post mae'n cwestiynnu cywirdeb/perthnasedd cynnwys erthygl Wikipedia am yr Iaith Gymraeg. Yn benodol y paragraff canlynol:"Welsh has a substantial presence on the Internet, but this is strongly biased towards public bodies: the ratio...
The ethos that underlies the Web – let alone Web 2.0 – is one of free speech. The Internet allows anyone anywhere to have their say, to comment, to publish; the current moves to so-called “social information” extends this freedom still further. The tools of the Internet in 2006 are tagging, blogs, shared book marking, wikis, and swickis. Which makes it all the more surprising that RSS Blog reported in ‘Wikipedia is broken’ that: Wikipedia is internatizing their link structure and removing many useful external links. Whenever you review these occurances, the Wikipedia folk are referring to all external links as link spam. [Its] usefulness as a portal to the Web is disappearing. Wikipedia is now a portal to Wikipedia, all links simply point back to Wikipedia. If Wikipedia...